You are viewing this forum as Guest , register and get access to all its feature , This is Free :-)
Xtreview Forum
May 20, 2013, 12:08:00 am *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: New Xtreview Forum!
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register  

Pages: [1] 2   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: AMD VS Intel - whose side are you on?  (Read 4599 times)
HI There ; Do you find this message annoying? Why not make a post and get rid of it ?
reuploaded
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 12


View Profile
« on: April 14, 2008, 09:53:04 pm »

What do you prefer, AMD or Intel when it comes to having a fast reliable and successful computer.
Logged
Xtreview
OC & OC & OC
Administrator
Xtreview member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1040


313800687
View Profile
« Reply #1 on: April 15, 2008, 07:54:16 am »

1 CHOSE ) Intel
2 CHOSE ) Intel
3 CHOSE ) Intel

1) Intel has currently the fastest processor , 2) Intel processor run cool , 3) Intel processor overclock a lot higher .
1) Slower than intel processor (but performance still acceptable) , 2) Run normally , 3) poor overclocking potential .


Logged

Intel Core i7 @ 4 GHZ :-)
Intel Core2 E8600 @ 6 GHZ
Intel Quad core @ 4200 Mhz ,
Intel Core 2 Duo @ 4700 Mhz,
Athlon X2 @ 3200 MHz .....
2x8800 ULTRA @ Vmod :-) .
4GB memory @ 1200 MHZ
2GB DDR3 @ 1600 MHz (Under test)....
2*2900 XT No crossfire
2xHD 4870 X2
2xGTX 280
Geforce 4 MX.......
cirereyes
Jr. Member
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 75


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: April 18, 2008, 03:20:35 pm »

I'm currently using Intel for my notebook and desktop computer. I think I will not go back to AMD until they figure out how to cool down their overheating processor.
Logged
Xtreview
OC & OC & OC
Administrator
Xtreview member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1040


313800687
View Profile
« Reply #3 on: April 18, 2008, 03:38:20 pm »

This will take a long time , trust me . Grin
Logged

Intel Core i7 @ 4 GHZ :-)
Intel Core2 E8600 @ 6 GHZ
Intel Quad core @ 4200 Mhz ,
Intel Core 2 Duo @ 4700 Mhz,
Athlon X2 @ 3200 MHz .....
2x8800 ULTRA @ Vmod :-) .
4GB memory @ 1200 MHZ
2GB DDR3 @ 1600 MHz (Under test)....
2*2900 XT No crossfire
2xHD 4870 X2
2xGTX 280
Geforce 4 MX.......
saurabh_batra1
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 43


View Profile Email
« Reply #4 on: April 19, 2008, 04:47:09 am »

Hi there, i think that everyone will go for intel if you want fast and reliable computer with great overclocking potential.There are no overheating problems also.
Logged
descorpio
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 26


View Profile Email
« Reply #5 on: April 20, 2008, 04:13:00 am »

These days the technology in AMD is good. For a normal user like me without gaming, i would say AMD and Intel are good. No differences. Infact AMD is lesser in price. But for a professional animanalist, gamer Intel is the best.
Logged
sanjay
Jr. Member
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 60


View Profile Email
« Reply #6 on: April 20, 2008, 10:30:52 pm »

if you are looking for fast and reliable computer with an extra advantage of overclocking then do not consider the price, just go for the intel.The price difference is not as big.
Logged
halogen19
Jr. Member
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 94


View Profile Email
« Reply #7 on: May 05, 2008, 06:25:56 am »

Intel Intel Intel. I'm not a fanboy but then I want the fastest and stablest thing. And Intel fits both these requirements plus the added overclocking makes it a clear win.
Logged
sox7000
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 184


ISLAM Is Peace


View Profile
« Reply #8 on: May 10, 2008, 02:31:40 pm »

Of course Intel is better as all members mentioned
BUT
AMD is decreasing it's delay and loss of competition by reducing prices so for most non overclocking users they should go for the processor that assured best bang for the bucks and it's often AMD
Logged



digitaljohn
Jr. Member
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 90


View Profile Email
« Reply #9 on: May 15, 2008, 10:01:16 pm »

I used to be a giant AMD fanboi, but the more I read about current processors, the more I'm leaning towards Intel for my next purchase.  It's hard to argue with faster/cooler/more efficient!  Hopefull AMD stays competitive.  Competition increases quality for every brand. Smiley
Logged
princee18
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 168


View Profile Email
« Reply #10 on: May 16, 2008, 10:14:54 pm »

I was nevar a big fan of AMD, AMD processors used to be better then intel but now intel is leading.AMD is cheaper but you need to compromise so,b ottom line is you get what you pay for. Intel chips are far more reliable and with intel hardware run flawless.

Logged
halogen19
Jr. Member
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 94


View Profile Email
« Reply #11 on: May 17, 2008, 01:23:30 am »

I think AMD did still have a good reputation until it messed up badly on the B2 stepping phenom's TLB bugs. Even though the bugs were not TOO much to worry about, and would generally be triggered only in extreme circumstances, it was still overhyped and AMD lost its trust in the customers. Add to that the side by side launch of 45nm Processors, Intel made a fortune!
Logged
Tommy
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 24


View Profile Email
« Reply #12 on: May 21, 2008, 03:34:11 pm »

If I have to say something that's good about AMD though, I'd have to say that the installation process is way easier. I've installed Semprons, X2's and Intel's high-end single core and low-end dual cores, and I find that AMD's heatsink/fan combinations are way easier to install than Intel's awful push-pin heatsink/fans Tongue
Logged
Xtreview
OC & OC & OC
Administrator
Xtreview member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1040


313800687
View Profile
« Reply #13 on: May 21, 2008, 03:40:58 pm »

Right AMD heat sink is a lot easier to install . but I don't really care since i am using (single stage or water  Grin Grin Grin)
Logged

Intel Core i7 @ 4 GHZ :-)
Intel Core2 E8600 @ 6 GHZ
Intel Quad core @ 4200 Mhz ,
Intel Core 2 Duo @ 4700 Mhz,
Athlon X2 @ 3200 MHz .....
2x8800 ULTRA @ Vmod :-) .
4GB memory @ 1200 MHZ
2GB DDR3 @ 1600 MHz (Under test)....
2*2900 XT No crossfire
2xHD 4870 X2
2xGTX 280
Geforce 4 MX.......
princee18
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 168


View Profile Email
« Reply #14 on: May 25, 2008, 07:36:18 pm »

yes its easier as compared to INTEL's heat sink but still the amount of force required to clamp down the heatsink to the CPU is scary.
Logged
Pages: [1] 2   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.18 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines | Sitemap Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 1.213 seconds with 20 queries.