OOPS! You forgot to upload swfobject.js ! You must upload this file for your form to work.


INTEL PENTIUM E2140 VS 3800+ VS X6800 REVIEW , BENCHMARK AND OVERCLOCKING


           

Intel Pentium e2140 vs 3800+ vs x6800  review , benchmark and overclocking
Posted:2007-06-03 By Cpu review
Number of View:85443




INTEL PENTIUM E2140 VS 3800+ VS

X6800 REVIEW , BENCHMARK AND

OVERCLOCKING



By :Cpu review

Posted:2007-06-03






xtreview is your : Video card - cpu - memory - Hard drive - power supply unit source

Intel Pentium e2140 vs 3800+ vs x6800  review , benchmark and overclocking



Three week ago we published a review with some overclock stats for processor Pentium e2140 (we used three copy). This processor drew our attention  , first , its cost is similar to  new Celeron: This dual core processor cost $75. IN addition , it has a large overclocking capability , which exceeds 3 GHz. In other words, there are no doubts that Pentium e2140 is excellent choice for inexpensive system.

Now in our hands proved to the more expensive processor Pentium e2160, whose cost compose $85. For these additional 10 dollars, we obtain higher clock frequency  (by 200 MHz), which from the first view in not so important for overclocker.

Pentium e2160 preview :

First , let us introduce the specifications of this processor.

  Pentium e2160
Processor core Allendale (Conroe-1M)
Default frequency 1.8 GHz
System bus Frequency 800 MHz
Multiplier 9x
Second Cache level 1 Mbyte
Packing LGA775
Production Technology n 65 nm
Core Stepping L2
TDP 65 W
Supply voltage 1.225-1.325 v
Enhanced halt state (C1 E) technology Yes
Enhanced intel speedstep Yes
Execute disable bit Yes
Intel EM64T Yes
Intel thermal monitor 2 Yes
Intel virtualization technology No

All specifications, with exception of clock frequencies and cache volume (in the second level), repeat the characteristics of processors core 2 Duo with core allendale stepping L2, which is completely regular , since precisely this core make base Of Pentium e2160. In contrast to the budget processors celeron, new Pentium E21X0, although do not support the technology virtualization, But they possess the complete set of technologies switching based , including Enhanced intel speedstep.

We note that the lower cache volume did not decrease the heat emission. The processors Pentium E21X0 have the same TDP value , as processors core 2 Duo.

Here is the Traditional screen shot CPU- Z , witch completely confirms the data posted above in the table.

pentium e2160 cpu z

pentium e2160 cache

Pentium e2160  : 1 MB vs 2 MB vs 4 MB -- Core 2 Duo Cache dependency

After the appearance of processors Pentium e2000 , in the market we have three accessible model dual core CPU with micro-architecture core, characterized by the divided cache in the second level (volume 4, 2 and 1 Mbyte ). In this review , we will check the influence of L2 cache in various application. For this we compared the processor Pentium e2160 ( clock frequency 1.8 GHz and 1- mega-byte cache ) with Core 2 Duo e4300 (with 1.8 GHz frequency and L2 cache volume 2 Mbytes), and also with hypothetical processor core 2 Duo, which works at frequency 1.8 GHz with 4 MB cache. Since among Intel core 2 Duo there is no processor with 800Mhz system bus , for the tests we used the Core 2 Extreme x6800 with the lowered to 9x multiplier and the system bus frequency was set to 800 MHz. :-)

Tests were executed in the motherboard ASUS P5K deluxe (LGA775, Intel p35) with DDR 2-800 SDRAM and 2 Gb  memory (Mushkin XP 2-6400PRO, 2 x 1024 MB, DDR 2-800, 4- 4- 4-12), graphic card powerColor x1900 XTX 512MB and hard disk : western digital WD1500AHFD.

On the graphs below we compared the performance of dual core processors with micro-architecture core, which work at frequency 1.8 GHz, 800Mhz system bus and with cache volume (L2 ) 1, 2 or 4 Mbytes.

Pentium e2160  : 1 MB vs 2 MB vs 4 MB -- Video , audio office ..

4mb vs 2 mb vs 1 mb : core 2 duo video

4mb vs 2 mb vs 1 mb : core 2 duo video

During video coding , the influence of cache size is noticeable . The difference in results between processors with 4- megabyte and 1 mega-byte cache compose 3-4%.

4mb vs 2 mb vs 1 mb : core 2 duo audio

Similar result is observed during audio coding  . But, here the difference reach 5%.

4mb vs 2 mb vs 1 mb : core 2 duo word

Microsoft office word 2007 loses in speed with decrease in second level cache volume  . Moreover, if processor with 2 mega-byte cache is slower than its analog with 4MB cache by 5%, then with further cache reduction , performance loss reach 15-16% (1MB vs 4 MB).

4mb vs 2 mb vs 1 mb : core 2 duo excel

Microsoft office excel 2007 also sensitively reacts to cache volume .

4mb vs 2 mb vs 1 mb : core 2 duo 7zip

Here the picture repeat the result in tests Word 2007.

4mb vs 2 mb vs 1 mb : core 2 duo photoshop

Adobe photo-shop CS3 do not relates to cache volume , all processor with different cache volume show similar performance.

4mb vs 2 mb vs 1 mb : core 2 duo primiere pro

In Adobe premiere pro 2.0 , difference in performance between processors with 4 and 2 Mbytes cache volume is practically null. However, with further decrease in cache volume ( to 1 Mbytes ) we observed immediately 5% speed drop .

4mb vs 2 mb vs 1 mb : core 2 duo sonar

The performance of sonar depends on cache volume but moderately. The difference between processor are in the limits of 5-6%.

4mb vs 2 mb vs 1 mb : core 2 duo 3dsmax 8

Here the difference in speed does not exceed 3%.

Thus, the influence of cache size is manifested first in office applications. However, in the majority of tasks, connected with multimedia content , the importance of cache volume is not overestimated. In such programs with the selection of processor (micro-architecture core) using the maximum L2 volume , it is possible to obtain only small gain in performance , value reach only 3-5%.

Pentium e2160  : 1 MB vs 2 MB vs 4 MB -- Gaming performance

But what about gaming performance . here  should we have a different result ???.

4mb vs 2 mb vs 1 mb : core 2 duo  gaming : quake 4

4mb vs 2 mb vs 1 mb : core 2 duo  gaming : fear

4mb vs 2 mb vs 1 mb : core 2 duo  gaming : company of heroes

Actually, games sensitively react to processors cache volume  .  For this reason, the new processors series Pentium e2000 will be hardly named as good solution for gamer. Investment in more expensive Core 2 Duo, even series e4000 is completely justified for gamer.

Pentium e2160  vs Athlon 64 X2 3800+ :

As you see, using the micro-architecture core, the processors Pentium e2160 show completely different performance level , than their high end version core 2 Duo. Specifically,  there for comparison , Pentium e2160 are analogous to AMD processor , as reference we used today the Athlon 64 X2 3800+. For this new cpu we used the mainboard ASUS M2N32-SLI deluxe (Socket AM2, NVIDIA nForce 590 SLI).

The obtained results are given in the table:

  Pentium e2160 Athlon 64 X2 3800+
3DMark06 5694 5620
3DMark06, CPU 1547 1496
PCMark05 5652 5538
PCMark05, CPU 4537 4035
AutoGK 2.4/xvid 1.2, fps 25.91 22.07
AutoGK 2.4/divX 6.6, fps 38.57 31.7
H.264 Encoding, Apple quicktime pro 7, sec 541 631
mp3 encoding, Apple iTunes 7, sec 193 223
Word 2007 (Document compare), sec 71 75
Photoshop CS3, sec 122 154
Sonar 6.2, sec 183 245
Excel 2007, sec 68.06 93.68
7 Zip 4.45, Compressing, KB/s 2370 2356
Premiere pro 2.0, sec 284 312
3ds max 8 (SPECapc), Rendering 2.62 2.35
CINEBENCH 9.5 555 563
Fritz 9 Chess benchmark 2485 2306
ScienceMark 2.0, Primordia 950 1039
Quake 4, 1024x768 high quality 76 82.42
F.E.A.R ; Medium quality 77 92
Company of heroes, 1024x768 86.9 88.1
Supreme commander 14721 15256
Valve source engine particle benchmark 28 28

pentium e2160 vs athlon x2 3800+ : 3d 2006

pentium e2160 vs athlon x2 3800+ : 3d2006 cpu

pentium e2160 vs athlon x2 3800+ : pc mark

pentium e2160 vs athlon x2 3800+ : pcmark cpu

pentium e2160 vs athlon x2 3800+ : autogk

pentium e2160 vs athlon x2 3800+ : autogk

pentium e2160 vs athlon x2 3800+ : h264 encoding

pentium e2160 vs athlon x2 3800+ : mp3 encoding

pentium e2160 vs athlon x2 3800+ : wod 2007

pentium e2160 vs athlon x2 3800+ : photoshop cs3

pentium e2160 vs athlon x2 3800+ : sonar

pentium e2160 vs athlon x2 3800+ : excel 2007

pentium e2160 vs athlon x2 3800+ : 7zip

pentium e2160 vs athlon x2 3800+ : primer pro

pentium e2160 vs athlon x2 3800+ : 3dsmax 8

pentium e2160 vs athlon x2 3800+ : cinebench

pentium e2160 vs athlon x2 3800+ : fritz

pentium e2160 vs athlon x2 3800+ : sicence mark

pentium e2160 vs athlon x2 3800+ : quake 4

pentium e2160 vs athlon x2 3800+ : fear

pentium e2160 vs athlon x2 3800+ : company of heroes

pentium e2160 vs athlon x2 3800+ : supreme commander

pentium e2160 vs athlon x2 3800+ : valve source benchmark

In the majority of real applications and tests , the new processor Pentium e2160 is faster than its competitor, Athlon 64 X2 3800+. However, picture radically changes, when discussion deal with games. WE note the strong drop in the performance (IN game) of processors with micro-architecture core, (due to its low cache volume ), witch make athlon 64 X2 3800+ faster in game .

Pentium e2160  Overclocking : 3.4 GHz ready ..!!

However, this still a bit early before the final conclusions . The low price of processors Pentium e2160 together with their micro-architecture core makes them completely interesting overclock object  . According to our last review (where we checked 3 processor copy), those CPU can overclock to frequencies on the order of 3.2-3.4 GHz. As it was shown above, in the large number of tasks the cache size does not play determining role; therefore, being overclocked to such frequencies, new processors can demonstrate a completely worthy performance.

In order to confirm or to refute these assumptions, we decided to study the frequency potential of this processor. WE used in this case  the air cooler zalman CMPS9700 LED.

Overclocking was performed by FSB frequency increase , the processor multiplier remained in regular state 9x. With increase in its supply voltage to 1.5 v we succeeded in increasing the FSB frequency to 378 MHz, which allowed to reach the frequency 3.4 GHz. In this state the processor was completely stable, This was checked with utilities SP2004/ORTHOS and OCCT.

pentium e2160 overcloced @ 3.4 ghz

Pentium e2160@ 3.4 Ghz  vs Core 2 Extreme x6800:

This is good result, since the processor frequency with overclock was increased by 89% ( witch is higher than high end processor [core 2 Extreme] ) .

Tests were conducted in the configuration, described above.

  Pentium e2160 @ 3.4GHz Core 2 Extreme x6800
3DMark06 6607 6481
3DMark06, CPU 2847 2532
PCMark05 8490 8159
PCMark05, CPU 8597 7445
AutoGK 2.4/xvid 1.2, fps 46.28 41.27
AutoGK 2.4/divX 6.6, fps 68.98 62.13
H.264 Encoding, Apple quicktime pro 7, sec 278 334
mp3 encoding, Apple iTunes 7, sec 99 114
Word 2007 (Document compare), sec 42 38
Excel 2007, sec 38.95 40.15
7 Zip 4.45, Compressing, KB/s 4118 4209
Photoshop CS3, sec 67 75
Sonar 6.2, sec 106 110
Premiere pro 2.0, sec 154 177
3ds max 8 (SPECapc), Rendering 4.78 4.39
CINEBENCH 9.5 1038 910
Fritz 9 Chess benchmark 4624 4147
ScienceMark 2.0, Primordia 1822 1561
Quake 4, 1024x768 high quality 123.34 126.96
F.E.A.R ; Medium quality 120 112
Company Of heroes, 1024x768 121.9 126.4
Supreme commander 16194 16148
Valve source engine particle benchmark 52 52

pentium e2160@3.4ghz vs Core 2 Extreme x6800: 3dmark 2006

pentium e2160@3.4ghz vs Core 2 Extreme x6800: 3d2006 cpu

pentium e2160@3.4ghz vs Core 2 Extreme x6800: pcmark

pentium e2160@3.4ghz vs Core 2 Extreme x6800: pcmark cpu

pentium e2160@3.4ghz vs Core 2 Extreme x6800: autogk

pentium e2160@3.4ghz vs Core 2 Extreme x6800: autogk

pentium e2160@3.4ghz vs Core 2 Extreme x6800: h.264 encoding

pentium e2160@3.4ghz vs Core 2 Extreme x6800: mp3 encoding

pentium e2160@3.4ghz vs Core 2 Extreme x6800: word 2007

pentium e2160@3.4ghz vs Core 2 Extreme x6800: 7zip

pentium e2160@3.4ghz vs Core 2 Extreme x6800: excel 2007

pentium e2160@3.4ghz vs Core 2 Extreme x6800: phtoshop cs3

pentium e2160@3.4ghz vs Core 2 Extreme x6800: sonar

pentium e2160@3.4ghz vs Core 2 Extreme x6800: primiere pro

pentium e2160@3.4ghz vs Core 2 Extreme x6800: 3ds max 8

pentium e2160@3.4ghz vs Core 2 Extreme x6800: cinebenc 9.5

pentium e2160@3.4ghz vs Core 2 Extreme x6800: fritz chess benchmark

pentium e2160@3.4ghz vs Core 2 Extreme x6800: science mark 2.0

pentium e2160@3.4ghz vs Core 2 Extreme x6800: quake 4

pentium e2160@3.4ghz vs Core 2 Extreme x6800: fear

pentium e2160@3.4ghz vs Core 2 Extreme x6800: company of heroes

pentium e2160@3.4ghz vs Core 2 Extreme x6800: supreme commander

pentium e2160@3.4ghz vs Core 2 Extreme x6800: valve source engine

The Advantage of the overclocked Pentium e2160 is clear in most case  . Only in several tasks this processor loses over Core 2 Extreme x6800, witch possesses 4- mega-byte cache in the second level. This speaks, that the performance of contemporary top end processor, when desired, is possible to get also from CPU with price less than $100.

The result received from the overclocked Pentium e2160 can\'t be compared with processors athlon 64 X2 3600+ and Athlon 64 X2 3800+ . To test this overclocked processor with a worthy competitor we should use at least the 3 GHZ CPU athlon 64 X2 6000+, which in most case lose over core 2 Extreme x6800, So there is no sense to compare them , The overclocked e2160 is a lot faster







xtreview is your : Video card - cpu - memory - Hard drive - power supply unit source

Intel Pentium e2140 vs 3800+ vs x6800  review , benchmark and overclocking







we would be happy to answer for your question . if you have suggestion or comment regarding this review our support would be glad to help just join our forum and ask u will get the best answer to discuss check our forum section :-)

RATE THIS REVIEW

   / 5   View Stat

xtreview -  Intel Pentium e2140 vs 3800+ vs x6800  review , benchmark and overclocking

Intel Pentium e2140 vs 3800+ vs x6800 review , benchmark and overclocking
Intel Pentium e2140 vs 3800+ vs x6800 review , benchmark and overclocking


xtreview -  7600gt is the middle card range.
We already benchmarked this video card and found that ...

7600gt review
7600gt is the middle card range. We already benchmarked this video card and found that ...



Loading ...


Search News                 

 geforce 8800gtx and 8800gts
 Xtreview software download Section
 AMD TURION 64 X2 REVIEW
 INTEL PENTIUM D 920 , INTEL PENTIUM D 930
 6800XT REVIEW
 computer hardware REVIEW
 INTEL CONROE CORE DUO 2 REVIEW VS AMD AM2
  INTEL PENTIUM D 805 INTEL D805
 Free desktop wallpaper
 online fighting game
 Xtreview price comparison center
Lastest 15 Reviews

  • 233-e8600 vs q9400 which is better dual or quad core
  • By:Cpu review

  • 232-intel core i7 920 review benchmark and overclocking
  • By:processor review

  • 231-efi bios review msi click bios
  • By:Other review

  • 230-driver scanner review , search and update your drivers
  • By:Software review

  • 229-radeon hd 4670 vs geforce 9500 gt vs geforce 9800 gt vs hd 4850 overclock benchmark and review
  • By:Video card review

  • 228-crossfire hd 4870 x2 vs crossfire hd 4870 review and benchamrk
  • By:Video card review

  • 227-hd 4870 x2 vs gtx 280 full review and benchmark
  • By:computer news

  • 226-amd radeon hd 4870 x2 2x1gb xtreview exclusive review
  • By:Video card review

  • 225-best antivirus software for 2008 - full review
  • By:computer news

  • 224-registry cleaner roundup
  • By:computer news

  • 223-apack zerotherm processor cooler review : btf80 btf90 btf92 o.e btf95 fanless and nirvana nv120 premium
  • By:Processor cooler review

  • 222-choosing your computer optimum configurations
  • By:computer selection

  • 221-budget cooler review
  • By:Cooler review

  • 220-nvidia 9600 gt review and benchmark
  • By:video card review

  • 219-geforce 8800 gts vs 8800 gt vs hd 2900 xt vs hd 3850 vs hd 3870 review benchmark and overclocking
  • By:Video card review

    Click Here To



  • 101-sony vgn-fj1sr review notebook performance benchmark
  • By:notebook review

  • 102-toshiba tecra a6-s513 review notebook performance benchmark
  • By:notebook review

  • 103-retrieve lost partition undelete unformat file recovery
  • By:hdd recovery

  • 104-imac review intel duo core vs imac g5
  • By:hardware review

  • 105-x1900xtx review benchmark overclock performance
  • By:video card review

  • 106-nvidia nforce 500 vs ati crossfire 3200 chipset review
  • By:chipset review

  • 107-d 310 review celeron d310 overclock
  • By:cpu review

  • 108-intel conroe core duo 2 review vs amd am2
  • By:cpu review

  • 109-external hard drive review test comparison : transcend smartdisk kano codi seagate wiebetech wd buffalo linksys ximeta cms
  • By:hdd test

  • 110-cpu comparison chart benchmark intel vs amd speed 3damrk unreal2004 far cry doom
  • By:new reviewer

  • 111-cpu comparison chart benchmark encoding intel vs amd speed
  • By:new reviewer

  • 112-cpu comparison chart daily use benchmark intel vs amd speed
  • By:new reviewer

  • 113-reset bios password dell laptop desktop toshiba ibm compaq and other
  • By:hardware review

  • 114-7600gs review overclock benchmark volt mod : palit
  • By:video card review

  • 115-conroe e6600 review benchmark vs amd fx 62 vs fx 60 vs intel 955 xe
  • By:conroe reiew

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     






















































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































    xtreview -








    video card 7900 GTX







     

     

     

     

    Last News


    - The new version of GPU-Z finally kills the belief in the miracle of Vega transformation
    - The motherboard manufacturer confirms the characteristics of the processors Coffee Lake
    - We are looking for copper coolers on NVIDIA Volta computing accelerators
    - Unofficially about Intels plans to release 300-series chipset
    - The Japanese representation of AMD offered monetary compensation to the first buyers of Ryzen Threadripper
    - This year will not be released more than 45 million motherboards
    - TSMC denies the presentation of charges from the antimonopoly authorities
    - Radeon RX Vega 64 at frequencies 1802-1000 MHz updated the record GPUPI 1B
    - AMD itself would like to believe that mobile processors Ryzen have already been released
    - AMD Vega 20 will find application in accelerating computations
    - Pre-orders for new iPhone start next week
    - Radeon RX Vega 57, 58 and 59: the wonders of transformation
    - ASML starts commercial delivery of EUV-scanners
    - The older Skylake processors with a free multiplier are removed from production
    - Meizu will release Android-smartphone based on Helio P40
    - AMD Bristol Ridge processors are also available in American retail
    - The fate of Toshiba Memory can be solved to the next environment
    - duo GeForce GTX 1080 Ti in GPUPI 1B at frequencies of 2480-10320 MHz
    - New Kentsfield overclocking record up to 5204 MHz
    - Lenovo released Android-smartphone K8

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     






























































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































       
      Click Here For Full Screen Size
    HALO 3 HALO 3 - Final Fight!



    PREY Prey is something you don t often see anymore: a totally unigue shooter experience.
    Today Image  

    computer news computer parts review Old Forum Downloads New Forum Login Join Articles terms Hardware blog Sitemap Get Freebies

    Page loaded in 0.027 seconds.

    xtreview English to German | xtreview English to Spanish | xtreview English to French | xtreview English to Italian | xtreview English to Portuguese | xtreview English to Greek | xtreview English to Japenese | xtreview English to Korean | xtreview English to Russian | xtreview English To Chinese Tradational | xtreview English To arabic