ATHLON 64 FX 62 AM2 REVIEW BENCHMARK

ATHLON 64 FX 62 AM2 REVIEW BENCHMARK
Posted:2006-05-22 By hardware review Number of View:88769
ATHLON 64 FX 62 AM2 REVIEW BENCHMARK By :hardware review Posted:2006-05-22 xtreview is your : Video card - cpu - memory - Hard drive - power supply unit source Athlon 64 FX 62 AM2 review benchmark AMD Generation framework -AM2 news media after (formerly code-named M2), but for some time we look forward to its full, after all, most of the existing high-performance high-end Athlon 64 FX-60 performance, the updated version of the framework will be introduced should Logically more outstanding performance upgrade only, This is why we all hope confidence -- one of the reasons AMD can quickly launch. However, Intel is certainly not a more fuel-efficient lights in the next available Peleser core, into a comprehensive system-crafts 65nm technology, coupled with the imminent launch of Merom, Conroe performance of the core functions of the momentum of the super-power, it seems AMD\'s AM2 has yet more robust backup system to do more pressure effects, if present through numerous media exposure of the information, whether or stronger 5000+ AM2 4800+ 4x2 4x2, Intel Merom and Conroe are only in the power of bow the head games, the AM2 Is AMD on the useless so? . If AMD knew AM2 structure useless, it does not intend to believe the outset introduced (of course there may be exceptions, perhaps originally developed did not take into account those, or even to have to do the follow-up version of the transition, these are possible. . . ) to the current trend of AMD, there is no reason not to fight a battle of it is still attached to the super-AM2 is small? This is probably a new big brother from FX-60 FX-62 AM2 structure is clear, stresses that! If not carefully read CPU Top version marker numbers, that is, prior to the Athlon 64 with FX-60 also not different, the appearance is the same, the difference is marked above, and Tibet in the south under the core This FX-62 introduced Windsor core, 90nm system Cheng, SOI, for the 2.8GHz frequency, L1=128K roof, L2=1MB roof, for 125W power consumption, the structure is AM2 †ª! Therefore, the bottom will be found to turn the Socket 939 with the structure now is not the same. Kwong, only to FX-62 is also not clear expression of the exterior differences, particularly here now for the first Socket 939 architecture FX-55 FX-62 comparison with, basically, nothing positive appears to be differences, but once the turn over between the bottom feet Pin location, It can be seen two different versions of the framework, AM2 version is not installed in the popular 939 trainees. (I believe they AM2 more universal framework, manufacturers have introduced switching Block, it will allow the popular 939 CPU Installed on the board, AM2, and the current number of 939 popular support structure Main Board AM2 will also have a new version of the corresponding support AM2 structure design, because the same is true for the Intel series. . . ) Also from FX-62 marker which can be seen above the relevant information ADAFX62IAA6CS represents AMD Desktop version, FX series, the model was 62, is here to prove This AM2 Athlon 64 FX-62 identity, Of course we will also use the software to back up the exact literacy ESS CPU The more relevant information, and also marked 1.40V under that type of FX-62 1.40V Vcore voltage is applied, is the identification of the 4th Week 2006 production version, the origin of www.undp.org/missions/malaysia Malaysia, So here we can see that as early as three months prior to the already FX-62 entities. Along with the Computex Taipei to begin early in June, I believe that when one can see the great wall display AM2 series of related products, which in addition to the AMD series AM2 CPU , of course, have a counterpart Main Board Member, It is well known that at present there is a series of chips support AMD Group manufacturers and Main Board Manufacturers, of course, in addition to the Intel chip will not AM2 related group launched, like the recent fiery red nVIDIA or ATi and via, SiS and other chip manufacturers have corresponding version group, of course, Main Board Not to mention the manufacturers, have long waiting to happen, the time is constant Debug, whether we can have higher performance upgrade. Since the formal launch date from AM2 scheduled to 5/23 6/6 advance, and even notebook computers of mobile phone version of Turion 64 4x2 is pushing the former to 5/17 launched AMD also appears to operate immediately issued AM2, Otherwise let Conroe and Merom continued up effect continues, the series will be launched AM2 a degree of influence, however, even in the formal launch, but the pace can work with the manufacturers? Compared to the original intention of the formal launch in 6/6 AM2 structure, the volume of output can be synchronized corresponding Main Board And AM2 CPU Formal offer to the side understand the situation, I am afraid more than one month delay backward, it seems things are not as smooth as expected in the planning, and indeed seem to lose some Debug operations more time than expected. Since before there FX-62 entities, not to him! How can stimulate But to be able to mix with FX-62, can easily find the plank good can also be a support member, is the need to be able to support, after all, the current AM2 Main Board Are still not officially release the sampling, not every piece of plank supported AM2 FX-62 have tried this version, and if the old generation of chips using the former group (such as C51 version AM2), also appears to have reduced the actual performance FX-62 performance Therefore, The introduction of the latest version of the nForce, nForce 500 series to 570 SLI version with a mix FX-62, Next to the pilots of our Athlon 64 FX-62 good look at what is a heroic type, or black bear! FX-62 to squeeze out the maximum performance, so some of the platforms used in testing the latest version of the nForce 500 series chip group, which is used by the nForce 570 SLI version, although not the most high-grade nForce Ultra 590, But I believe in performance, performance should also be quite good results only, and has been supported by DDR 2 Memory Framework, the choice here is a particularly excellent performance of the Extreme Performance Memory Corsair launched version -CM2X512-5300C4 This matched modules for a total capacity of 1GB=512MBx2 double access CL=4-5-5-15; Furthermore, display card is the use of the latest GeForce 7900GTX 512MB, driven version of the procedure to 84.56, and other detailed information please refer to the table below platform. Testing before the CPU -Z 1.33.1 do detailed information about FX-62 recognized from Jietu, we can see that type Athlon 64 core FX-62 introduced Windsor for popular AM2 framework for the system - 90nm processes, core voltage to 1.440V (1.40V standards), can be seen from the above have been correctly identify a FX-62 Dual Core Microprocessors words, the ancient code for F-3-2, multimedia instruction sets is to support SSE3 and x86064. Operating frequency is 2.8GHz can see, for the 14.0x multiplier, the accident is 200MHz,Cache Memory Part is L1=64K+64K, L2=1MB. Detailed look at CPU -Z above Cache option can more clearly see the relevant section in the Cache FX-62 Memory Information, and Memory Detection can clearly see above relevant information is used in the Corsair DDR2 products. At the beginning of the test, so the latest version of the Sandra 2007 issued by the new version of Sandra 2007 can be found on FX-62 more information, here wanting to see Sandra in 2007 ended detection; can be seen from the following Jietu FX-62 more information, the performance indicators under construction, has reached PR4220 This FX-62 hierarchical (single core), that is, with the Pentium 4 4.2GHz comparison. (actually almost anymore, because it has worked alone FX-60 Pentium 4 XE 3.73GHz shed a) SiSoft Sandra 2007 Unlike the previous version of Sandra 2005 SR-3, alone and in groups on the part of many to increase, together with the latest Pentium 4 XE 955 and FX-60 benchmark results are included in the 11, which compared to last, is a relatively close to the actual results, here are three basic test test include Arithmetic, and Memory Bandwidth Multi-Media three tests, the first to see the first part of Arithmetic, the measured results for 20386/17276 FX-62. Compared to Pentium 4 XE 955 Alu is indeed part in a big slice of the win, and even more with its own highly FX-60 x 4800+ achievements, but also a lot of upgrading, it seems that the frequency or upgrade a degree of difference, after all, the actual frequency of 2.8GHz FX-62. In some of the Memory Bandwidth can see AM2 under matched with the performance of DDR2 how surprising performance, high 7595/7534 performance is a source of surprises, but far higher than the performance of the Intel i955X introduced DDR2 dual channel performance, We should know in DDR2 Intel i915 structure from the beginning until now i975X efforts appear AM2 transferred to the structure is unable to play a DDR2 DDR2 performance this point, we can have a better interpretation and vision; As for the comparison group could also see some results ATi Xpress 200 series, if nForce 570 framework mix Athlon 64 FX-62 results are then compared with, I really do not know RD580 performance than its own Xpress 200 upgrade? Ways to enhance the double? AM2 structure appears in the next battle for market, will close fight between very serious. (AM2 originally to switch to DDR2 Memory The framework is there some doubts, fears in this part of the performance is also credited as the DDR before the Merit? Data from the truth seems to be a bit more secure. . . May also use the chip with the group, the nVIDIA nForce 500 series appears to be a new generation of chips Group Wang) And Super Pi can see FX-62 part in the setting of 1M York 31 seconds results is higher than the Pentium 4 XE 3.73GHz some, but indeed anywhere in the Intel Conroe or Merom will be introduced. casual or Merom will run out of a Conroe 2x seconds results, it appears that this part of the expansion of FX-60 than FX-62 no. 3DMark series In addition to the previous tests, will be indispensable in the 3DMark series is the performance of testing procedures, from the 3DMark 2001 SE begin until the latest version of the 3DMark 06, we have 11 of 1024x768 and 1280x1024 resolution for the truth, From this part of the performance can be shown more clearly let us know what performance FX-62 performance. In 3DMark 2001 SE part to be found that the use of leaflets GeForce 7900GTX 512MB performance with the performance of 31128 to 34076, in fact Compared FX-60 results, but that is to some, after all, to have a higher frequency than FX-60. but also a mix of the latest nForce 570 chip group, in accordance with the increase took effect at SLI, dual 7900GTX cards should be more than 50,000 hours of performance results (1024x768 resolution), and is also quite well demonstrated. 3DMark 03 can be seen in some of the 1024x768 image of the performance results may reach 22727, even 1280x1024 resolution, the results are 18,306, in fact than the original FX-60 results higher. As 3DMark 05 can see the truth in 1024x768 image, the high score has reached 11,010, in fact here to say is that even with the introduction of the latest ATi RD580 version, which is the performance of Xpress 3200, and is not worried than that. Despite some considerable, not to mention the nVIDIA nForce 500 series is the most section of the 590 high-end workstations that have not yet formally come. In the latest edition of 3DMark 06, FX-62 mix nForce 570 SLI performance performance also reached the 7259 and 6137 high score, and the CPU Score is reached 2100 results compared FX-60 in this part of the test results about 19xx circumstances, a small degree of upgrade. PCMark 05 In the integrated test head PCMark 05, the same, the results FX-62 is good, because it joined the other components results in a mix nForce 570 performance after performance, but also the relative degree of upgrading, so that part of it will be a relatively good performance and positive effects, it seems, If we really should let FX-62 show the performance of the players that I am afraid, opted for the new version of the chip group appears to be relatively correct approach. (AM2 future extension to the existing structure will also chip group head, C51 series will be launched to support AM2 version, other chip manufacturers approach is the same group) Conclusion In the near future, we will be able to see comprehensive AM2 series Athlon 64 or Athlon 64 FX in the market circulation, and even more the next high-end core FX-64 and updated version will be rolled out 6,970, the actual frequency was eventually advance 3.0GHz mark. This is not easy AMD is a matter to the high-frequency and high-performance between the achievement of a perfect state does need time, not to mention AMD current structure is only AM2 is the first version of the switch to DDR2 starting point only, in comparison with the Intel already has a i915/925, 945/955, or even the soon to be released i975X 965 series is the evolution (the threshold of the fourth generation DDR2 architecture), AMD still is a rookie DDR2 architecture, of course, those corresponding chips Group manufacturers may not be so let AMD and acquired disorders of AM2 congenitally deficient, nForce 500 series launch is certainly a great future AM2 assistance, and the ATi Xpress 3200 will fully support AM2 structure, and even via and SiS will also have a counterpart version, after all, where the majority of the AMD Fans, even turn into AM2 structure, How to use DDR2 specifications, as are all-favorite AMD! Xiaobian individuals are taking a neutral view, after all the users, the purchase price is reasonable and the main key performance Circle K, as originally introduced in the Intel AM2 up to a LGA775 Socket 478 structure, the change in the CPU History has come very many times has occurred, change any relationship, the focus is really provides users better performance and utility performance, and then the price can be accepted by users, or otherwise as FX-62 such high-end Pentium XE 955/965 CPU , at several million NT, you ~ really buy this? To put it bluntly, is open for questions. xtreview is your : Video card - cpu - memory - Hard drive - power supply unit source we would be happy to answer for your question . if you have suggestion or comment regarding this review our support would be glad to help just join our forum and ask u will get the best answer to discuss check our forum section :-) RATE THIS REVIEW 1 2 3 4 5    / 5   View Stat

computer news computer parts review Old Forum Downloads New Forum Login Join Articles terms Hardware blog Sitemap Get Freebies