amd 4400+ brisbane vs e6300 review benchmark

	xtreview is your : Video card - cpu - memory - Hard drive - power supply unit source

Recommended : Free unlimited image hosting with image editor

POSTER: computer news   ||   AMD 4400+ BRISBANE VS E6300 REVIEW BENCHMARK	DATE:2006-12-12
The relative accessibility of 0.065 m processors athlon 64 X2 on core brisbane just start. The deliveries of data processors in this year will be oriented on the OEM market, and in the retail network we will hardly see them. Moreover, AMD did not supply the models of 0.065 m processors for leading sites; therefore all relative to their overclocking potential, until now still unknown. in China was published the comparative test Of athlon 64 X2 4400+ (2.3 GHz) on the the new 0.065 m core brisbane and Core 2 Duo e6300 (1.86 GHz). These two processors were selected for the comparison nonaccidentally: as showed Chinese associates tests, they can compete each one with other in the plan of speed, although Core 2 Duo e6300 frequently occurs in front, yes even with its cheaper price ($183 against $214). As rule, Core 2 Duo e6300 appear to be faster, also after overclock, it only interfere withs the high default frequency of system bus and low multiplier. However, the overclock of 0.065 m processor athlon 64 X2 4400+ until know still unknown . Let us recall that the characteristics of processor athlon 64 X2 4400+ after transfer from 0.09 m to 0.065 m technical process changed as follows: frequency grew from 2.2 GHz to 2.3 GHz, volume cache in the second level decreased from 2 X 1 mb to 2 X 512 KB. Accordingly, applications sensitive to the cache volume will show lower performance with the new processor . Here is the photograph of the series processor athlon 64 X2 4400+ on the stepping G1 cores brisbane. It has marking ADO4400IAA5DD, it relates to the class Of energy efficient, concrete copy is released on 43 week of 2006, i.e., during October. The screen shot of CPU- Z do not give any special update. As is known, 0.065 m processors athlon 64 X2 obtained the step of multiplier of 0.5x; therefore in this model default multiplier is equal 11.5x, and the clock frequency was equal to 2.3 GHz. Due to the support of function C1 E at idle time the processor consumes less than previous cpu. The system on the base Of athlon 64 X2 4400+ (2.3 GHz) demonstrated a smaller energy consumption at idle in comparison with the system on the base Of core 2 Duo e6300 (1.86 GHz). The energy consumption of entire system  was measured; therefore to isolate the current processors power is sufficiently complicated. Under load the system on the base Of athlon 64 X2 4400+ consumed more energy than conroe. After taking a look to the test result which will fellow later we found that the relationship of price / performances in Core 2 Duo e6300 are far better. In order to correct the result, For AMD it is necessary to reduce the price of Athlon 64 X2 4400+. We hope that this will start in the beginning of the mass deliveries for 0.065 m processors. Athlon 64 X2 4400+ vs core 2 duo e6300 power comparison Athlon 64 X2 4400+ vs core 2 duo e6300 multimedia and office performance Athlon 64 X2 4400+ vs core 2 duo e6300 encoding performance Athlon 64 X2 4400+ vs core 2 duo e6300 3dmark benchmark Athlon 64 X2 4400+ vs core 2 duo e6300 gaming test     Related Products :

	xtreview is your : Video card - cpu - memory - Hard drive - power supply unit source

Xtreview Support N-Post:xxxx Xtreview Support	AMD 4400+ BRISBANE VS E6300 REVIEW BENCHMARK
	Please Feel Free to write any Comment; Thanks

XT Future Member N-Post:	AMD 4400+ BRISBANE VS E6300 REVIEW BENCHMARK
	It would be nice if you had labeled the benchmark\'s as it leaves you guessing is this the amount of time for completion or amount done in time.

Related news:

amd 4400+ brisbane vs e6300 review benchmark (2006-12-12)

Post Quick Reply:

                                        
Verif code:

                 

computer news computer parts review Old Forum Downloads New Forum Login Join Articles terms Hardware blog Sitemap Get Freebies