CPU CHART INTEL CONROE X6800 - E6700 - E 6600 VS AMD FX 62 FX 60 X2 4000+ VS PENTIUM XE 965 XE 955 XE 840 D820 D810 REVIEW AND OVERALL PERFORMANCE BENCHMARK TEST

CPU CHART INTEL CONROE X6800 - E6700 - E 6600 VS AMD FX 62 FX 60 X2 4000+ VS PENTIUM XE 965 XE 955 XE 840 D820 D810 REVIEW AND OVERALL PERFORMANCE BENCHMARK TEST
Posted:2006-09-20 By cpu review Number of View:67294
CPU CHART INTEL CONROE X6800 - E6700 - E 6600 VS AMD FX 62 FX 60 X2 4000+ VS PENTIUM XE 965 XE 955 XE 840 D820 D810 REVIEW AND OVERALL PERFORMANCE BENCHMARK TEST By :cpu review Posted:2006-09-20 xtreview is your : Video card - cpu - memory - Hard drive - power supply unit source Intel Core 2 duo X6800:first  on the new core As we already wrote earlier, the new Intel processors  under the code name Core 2 duo,  was included in  two subgroups - with the index "E" (consumption from 55 to 75 W) and only  one copy with highest  frequency of 2.93 GHz and index "X" with power consumption  above 75 W .the letter  index  is in association with the previous processors of   series "XE" - eXtreme Edition. Unfortunately, there is no additional bonus  over the desktop series  - only the high frequency (witch is good) , higher power consumption (witch is bad)  and the free multiplier witch overclocker will enjoy. Hardware and software used Test Configuration CPU Mainboard Memory Athlon 64 fx-62 MSI K9N SLI Platinum (Bios 9.03) Corsair Cm2x1024-6400 (5-5-5-12) Athlon 64 fx-60 EPoX Ep-9npa3 (Bios 06.03.30) Corsair Cmx1024-3500llpro (2-3-2-6) Core 2 duo E6600 Intel D975XBX (Bios 1181) Corsair Cm2x1024-6400 (5-5-5-12) Core 2 duo E6700 Intel D975XBX (Bios 1181) Corsair Cm2x1024-6400 (5-5-5-12) Core 2 duo X6800 Intel D975XBX (Bios 1334) Corsair Cm2x1024-6400 (5-5-5-12) Pentium XE 965 Intel D975XBX (Bios 1181) Corsair Cm2x1024-6400 (5-5-5-12) Video card - GeForce 7800GTX 256 mb (Megabyte) Memory used - 2 gb (2 modules 2*1 gig) Hard disk - Samsung SP1614C (SATA) Using default cooler - stock cooler was used in all processors Power supplay unit - Thermaltake PurePower 680 Watt Processor Athlon 64 fx-62 Athlon 64 fx-60 Core 2 duo E6600 Core 2 duo E6700 Core 2 duo X6800 Pentium XE 965 Tech  Process 90 nm 90 nm 65 nm 65 nm 65 nm 65 nm Core Frequency, GHz 2,8 2,6 2,4 2,66 2,93 3,73 Number or core 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cache L2 *, KB 2x1024 2x1024 4096 4096 4096 2x2048 Bus frequency **, MHz 400 ddr2 200 ddr 266 HT 266 HT 266 HT 266 HT Default Multiplier 14 13 9 10 11 14 Socket Socket AM2 Socket 939 LGA775 LGA775 LGA775 LGA775 Typical heat emission of *** 125 W 110 W 55-75 W 55-75 W > 75 W 130 W AMD64/EM64T + + + + + + Hyper-Threading - - - - - + Virtualization Technology + - + + + + Software Windows xp Professional X64 Edition SP1. 3ds max 7.0 Maya 6.5 Lightwave 8.5 x64 Edition WinRAR 3.51 "7.Zip 4.32 x64 Edition LAME 3.98 Monkey Audio 4.01 OGG Encoder 2.8 (Lancer) Windows media Encoder 9 x64 Edition MATLAB 7.1 Pro/ENGINEER Wildfire 2.0 SolidWorks 2005 Microsoft Visual C++ Professional 6.0 CPU RightMark 2005 lite x64 Edition F.E.A.R. 1.3 Half- life 2 Unreal Tournament 2004 build 3339 Quake 4 Release 1.1 FineReader Professional 8.0 Adobe Photoshop CS2 (9.0) Canopus ProCoder 2.01.30 DivX 6.1.1 Windows media Video 9 VCM x264 v.438 XviD 1.1.0 release Apache 2.0.55 for Windows Drivers NVIDIA ForceWare 91.31 NVIDIA nForce SMBus Driver 4.50 Intel INF Update Testing Some interesting details For the beginning small  We principally test all processor using the stock heat sink and of cource this one if far to be the best cooler availble but 90% of users will not care about it, taking into account that  in the complete set with the processor the cooling device has  been already  delivered. Intel Core 2 duo X6800 to us come without cooler, but we made the logical assumption that if the size of socket and the fan rotating was not changed, then cooler will be standard for all intel processors  this what we used. Standard cooler for Intel processors  with the copper base  The cooler used was more that enough to cool the conroe cpu the cpu idle temp was 28 c with room temp of 28c but keep in your mind that the new core Intel Core 2 is considerably less hotter than old, but it cooler  were developed  taking into account that Pentium 4 prescott witch was beating all records of heat emission GlacialTech Igloo 5071 PWM (to the right). Inexpensive, but completely successful cooler  for LGA775 with the screw fastening, which ensures good working temp. Three-dimensional simulation : 3dmax maya and lightwave benchmark The   additional 266 MHz  frequency produced smaller effect than earlier p4 version: the difference in performance between E6600 and E6700 composes approximately 10%, and between E6700 and X6800 - already modest 7%. .3d rendering application show that clock for clock conroe is about 75%-50% faster than AThlon 64 cpu.so in 2 ghz conroe cpu are about fast as 2500-3000 MHz athlon 64 cpu.the old p4 architecture show good result is such application thanks to the hyperthreading thechnologie witch give them the nice boost. as a reference the pentium xw965 is about as fast as fx62 amd cpu Math Lab For this test first part "FTT" the new conroe duo show twice better performace than amd cpu.the athlon x2 4000+ with has 2 x2.4 ghz is about twice slow than the conroe e6600 witch has the same frequency but with double cache ammount Pro engineer Solid works Compilation Well another good exemple of the artchitecture efficite the old p4 Dis completely fail.the 2 ghz  from intel 7.30 witch is better than all old intel p4.is this case conroe is about 25% faster than A64.in the overall the new intel conroe is about twice as fast as old petium d core Project RightMark Processing and images scanning  (photoshop) The same figure here . WEB- server For web server application.we devinded the task on three type small ,medium and big one.for the first one conroe is the leader even the top end fx 62 from amd is not able to catch the E6600 model.old p4 core is about somehow slower than A64 here.we see the same figure for medium and big task .the amd 64 still between the old p4 D and conroe cpu. Files Packing   well here is some daily use task winrar or 7-zip are file archiving utility.winrar as 7 zip are memory subsystem depondant so the higher the brandwidth the faster compression.Even the integrated memory controller with the low latency do not help the A64 to catch the conroe witch look powerful enough even in such memory related benchmark. in borth case the fx62 (2.8 ghz ) perform wrost that the 2.13 conroe cpu. Coding  audio data P4 was alwais stranger in those task for video/audio editing.conroe here is about 30% faster than A64 cpu witch already faster than p4 .intel do good job with conroe cpu since their new core is about 100% and even more faster clock for clock than intel pentium 4 d cpus Coding videodata Nothings new  in video encoding amd 64 cpu are in equality with old p4 cpus ,with slight lead.and conroe is taking by far the lead  showing isane encoding time witch about twice faster than with A64. Texts recognition System For fine reader the conroe is the leader and the same figure remain with A64 witch was faster than P4 D cpus but slower than intel new come. Three-dimensional games Well conroe cpu here break all the cpu limitation and max out for realy the video card.about 310 fps in low resolutionwith high end amd cpu  athlon 64 Fx-62 but with conroe x6800 u get about 510 fps witch is already 200 fps higher .nothings wrong with the new intel cpu all precedent benchmark showed that conroe has solid performance and a lot faster than A64 cpus.in medium setting conroe offer also nice boost with about 20 fps over the A64 cpu but here @ those setting it is pretty clear that card start to max out. Using half-life 2 result look even better.the variance in perfomance depond most in cpu .then conroe is without question the leader the high end conroe cpu x6800 offer 200-185-143 fps recpectively for low medium and high setting and resolution wile Amd 64 fx 62 has got only 121-119-97 wich in average lower by 80 to 60 fps   Quake 4 is alos cpu depondant game since conroe offer about 20% higher frame rate than amd 64 or p4 .here the A64 proof to be old gamer cpu with slight performance over the p4 d cpus. Well Amd 64 confirm here it lost over the current conroe cpu in gaming as in most all other application if not all.but as it was showin before it offer better game play than pentium 4 d cpu General marks Effectiveness in the conversion to the gigahertz of the frequency Conclusion The last general overall chart speak about the hole of benchmark serie done here.first about the effecity .conroe is by far more efficent than old p4 cpu in most case by twice amd about 25% and higher than amd 64 cpus.the AmD 64 fx 62 cpu did not solve the solution for amd cpu .i am pretty sure that even the next awaited fx 64 with 3 ghz frequency will not give any real boost just more heat.in general to get the performance of the conroe x6800 cpu from Amd cpu A64 this is dowable but with tone of cooling we are talking here about chiller or even azote.side power the conroe showed already extra result since it have lower power requirement than Amd 64 cpu.the only lack with conroe cpu is their motherboard witch until the moment prooved to be poor clocker but even with worst of them u can get easly the lowest conroe cpu to the 2 ghz ++ witch iss  enough to match and even break result from fx 62 cpu. xtreview is your : Video card - cpu - memory - Hard drive - power supply unit source we would be happy to answer for your question . if you have suggestion or comment regarding this review our support would be glad to help just join our forum and ask u will get the best answer to discuss check our forum section :-) RATE THIS REVIEW 1 2 3 4 5    / 5   View Stat

computer news computer parts review Old Forum Downloads New Forum Login Join Articles terms Hardware blog Sitemap Get Freebies